Comments on: Arsenal 1-1 Fulham- 2 points lost, or 1 point gained? http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/ Live Arsenal, Breathe Arsenal, Be Arsenal... Your World Is My World... The World of Arsenal... Mon, 13 May 2013 14:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: piresistible http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48472 piresistible Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:00:31 +0000 http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48472 Having watched Parker yet again dominate central midfield in yet another league match, and seeing the Spuds surge into the distance in the league; it is quite amazing what the two signings of Adebayor, Friedel and Parker alone have done for that club. We all slate Harry for his profligate spending but it’s unreal that having spent a combined £5 mil on Friedel/Bayor/Parker that he’s made Spuds improve so much more.
As for Parker, Please remember that Scott Parker cost just £5 million, Adebayor was a loan signing. Redknapp cleared out some shite and actually made a transfer market Profit over the summer (like Wenger to be fair) – but with the only difference being that Redknapp’s expenditure was just £5 million.

Wenger’s was over £50 million.

Yet Spuds look the much better side, and acquired much better quality players somehow. Anyone still think Parker ‘isn’t good enough for Arsenal?’. Because I’d take him over Song. Think we’d defend far better with Parker in the side. Jagielka should have been signed but Mertesacker was cheaper, Parker could have been signed but isn’t French-speaking. He’d have made Arsenal a much tougher side to beat imo.

I am genuinely concerned that the Spuds will finish Third in the league. If Bayor gets injured, their back-up is Defoe (not that shite). Ours is Chamakh. Some Gooners will deny it, but it looks a genuine possibility that Spuds will finish ahead of Arsenal this season. That should never ever be acceptable.

]]> By: pires http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48463 pires Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:02:57 +0000 http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48463 To put in in perspective, Manchester United had disappointing results both in midweek and at home to Newcastle. Chelsea did poorly in Europe, but turned it around against Wolves. Manchester City lost on Tuesday night and it must be hoped do so at Anfield if only to preserve the achievement of the ‘Invincibles’ in 2003/04. All the top teams are suffering.

Some felt there was a bit of spark missing from the Gunners approach play, although we endured matches like this with Fabregas and Nasri were in the team. I am not going to read too much into a draw in which the opposition’s strike was an own goal

]]> By: Jeffo http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48453 Jeffo Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:25:29 +0000 http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48453 Gary Speed – Welsh Legend and Gentleman, RIP, totaly shocked.

]]> By: fanboy http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48435 fanboy Sun, 27 Nov 2011 06:20:28 +0000 http://worldofarsenal.co.uk/2011/11/27/arsenal-1-1-fulham-2-points-lost-or-1-point-gained/#comment-48435 No mention of Theo? was another stand-out.
And another ‘positive’ is fulham are the only team that’s taken point from city

]]>